Best 8 a confederate form of government is subservient to the ________.

Below is the best information and knowledge about a confederate form of government is subservient to the ________. compiled and compiled by the team, along with other related topics such as:: how do state governments get power in a unitary government, what is confederal system of government, the state governments have more power than the central government., Compare the strength and weakness of federal confederal and unitary systems of government, What is the federal system of government, different governments federal confederal, and unitary answer key, unitary system of government, is one national government confederal.

a confederate form of government is subservient to the ________.

Image for keyword: a confederate form of government is subservient to the ________.

The most popular articles about a confederate form of government is subservient to the ________.

A Confederate Form Of Government Is Subservient To The …

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 4 ⭐ (25115 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 4 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 2 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about A Confederate Form Of Government Is Subservient To The … A confederate form of government is subservient to the ______. – During the first years of the united states, the central government was a.

  • Match the search results:
    Different systems of government give different degrees of control to the central government.
    One man may have a conscience;
    (unitary government) powerful central agency that delegates some power to lower levels of government (federal government) power divided by government between cen…

  • Quote from the source:

Federalism in Canada | The Canadian Encyclopedia

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 4 ⭐ (28264 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 4 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 2 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about Federalism in Canada | The Canadian Encyclopedia Federalism is a political system in which government power and responsibility is divided between a federal legislature and state or …

  • Match the search results: Federalism is a political system in which government power and responsibility is divided between a federal legislature and state or provincial legislatures. A true federation, in the modern sense, is a state in
    which the smaller parts are not sovereign and cannot legally secede. In practi…

  • Quote from the source:

Federalist Papers No. 10 (1787) – Bill of Rights Institute

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 3 ⭐ (16315 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 3 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 1 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about Federalist Papers No. 10 (1787) – Bill of Rights Institute Written by James Madison, this essay defended the form of republican government proposed by the Constitution.

  • Match the search results: AMONG the numerous advantages promised by a wellconstructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates…

  • Quote from the source:

Federalism in the Constitution | Boundless Political Science

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 3 ⭐ (6279 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 3 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 1 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about Federalism in the Constitution | Boundless Political Science Federalism is the system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally … movement arising out of discontent with the Articles of Confederation, …

  • Match the search results: The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution makes local government a matter of state rather than federal law, with special cases for territories and the District of Columbia. The states have adopted a wide variety of systems of local government. The US Census Bureau conducts the Census of Governments ev…

  • Quote from the source:

political system – Confederations and federations | Britannica

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 4 ⭐ (30098 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 4 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 2 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about political system – Confederations and federations | Britannica An example of confederal arrangements that gave birth to a federal union is … of a federal system), each of the member governments retains a substantial …

  • Match the search results: The European Union (EU) is a supranational organization that, while resisting strict classification as either a confederation or a federation, has both confederal and federal aspects. Its predecessor, the European Communities (EC)—comprising the European Coal and Steel Community, established in 1952…

  • Quote from the source:

A confederate form of government is subservient to the ______.

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 4 ⭐ (20661 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 4 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 2 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about A confederate form of government is subservient to the ______. Therefore, a confederate form of government is subservient to the national government. Send. You might be interested in.

  • Match the search results: A confederate form of government is a system of government that is made up of sovereign states or groups who come together to work for a common goal.

  • Quote from the source:

Subservient local governments – a threat to democracy | ICLD

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 3 ⭐ (18792 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 3 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 1 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about Subservient local governments – a threat to democracy | ICLD Today we meet Tomila Lankina, who is a Professor of International Relations at London School of Economics, and take part of her insights on …

  • Match the search results: – It is a good question. Local governments from my own research could be very effective vehicles for serving as a sort of checks and balances mechanism. In Russia, there is the municipal, regional and national levels. Often, elected local governments can challenge undemocratic decision-making of reg…

  • Quote from the source:

Federalism []

  • Author:

  • Evaluate 3 ⭐ (12030 Ratings)

  • Top rated: 3 ⭐

  • Lowest rating: 1 ⭐

  • Summary: Articles about Federalism [] The Articles of Confederation represented an opposite form of government, a confederation, which has a weak central government and strong state governments.

  • Match the search results: In creating a federalist system the founders were reacting to both the British government and the Articles of Confederation. The British government was — and remains — a unitary system, or one in which power is concentrated in a central government. In England, government has traditionall…

  • Quote from the source:

Multi-read content a confederate form of government is subservient to the ________.

For residents of New York State:

HOPE the advantages promised by a well-structured Alliance, nothing deserves to be developed more definitively than the tendency of factions to prevent and control violence. The friend of the people’s governments never worries about their character and destiny as he considers their inclination to this dangerous thing. For this reason, he will not fail to properly evaluate any plan that does not violate the principles to which it adheres and provides an appropriate treatment. The truth, instability, injustice, and confusion brought to popular assemblies were deadly diseases that killed popular governments everywhere; for continuing to be the favorite and fertile subject on which the opponents of freedom make their deepest statements. The remarkable refinements of the US constitution over popular models, both ancient and modern, certainly cannot be over appreciated; but it would be misplaced one-sidedness to assume that they actually averted the danger on this side as intended and intended. Complaints are heard everywhere from our most thoughtful and virtuous citizens, as well as from friends of public faith and individual freedoms, that our government is too unstable, that in the conflicts of opposing sides the public interest is ignored and Measures are often agreed. not by the rules of justice and the rights of the small party, but by the supreme power of a concerned and overwhelming majority. However, we may anxiously wish that the evidence of these baseless claims of known facts does not allow us to deny that they are true to some extent. Indeed, a candid examination of our situation reveals that some of our suffering is wrongly blamed on the functioning of our governments; but he will also discover that other causes do not only cause much of our greatest unhappiness; and in particular because of the widespread and growing distrust of public participation and the alarm about private rights that resounded across the continent. These are largely, if not entirely, the effects of the instability and injustice that a stubborn spirit has tainted our public administrations.

As a faction, majority or minority as a whole, I understand that some citizens are united and are driven by some common passion or interest in the rights of citizens. for other people or for long-term and collective interests. community.

There are two methods of curing sectarian defects: first, removing the cause; another, by controlling their effects.

Again, there are two methods of eliminating the faction cause: first, by destroying the freedom necessary for its existence; another, by giving all citizens the same idea, the same passion, and the same interests.

It can never be said more accurately than the first remedy that it is worse than the disease. Freedom is to shoot the air faction, without it a tool will end immediately. But to abolish the freedom necessary for political life because it fosters factions cannot be more foolish than to demand that the air necessary for animal life be destroyed, for this sets fire to its destructive agency.

The second solver is so improbable that the first is unwise. As long as man’s reason continues to deviate and he is free to use it, different opinions will arise. As long as the link between reason and narcissism continues, their ideas and passions will influence each other; and the first will be objects to which the second will bind itself. Diversity in human spheres where property rights take root is not an insurmountable obstacle to uniformity of interests. Protecting these abilities is the primary goal of government. From preserving different and unequal possibilities of appropriation, having different degrees and types of property yields immediate results; and because of their effect on the feelings and opinions of their owners, it causes the division of society into different sides and interests.

The hidden causes of the factions are thus planted in human nature; and everywhere we see them involved in different degrees of effectiveness according to the different conditions of civil society. Enthusiasm for divergent views on religion, government, and many other points, and speculation about practice; commitment to different leaders who want power and dominance; or for other identified persons whose fates are interesting to human passions, who in turn divide humanity into sides, hostile among themselves, and tend to offend and oppress one another rather than cooperate for their common good. People are so prone to mutual hostility that even the most frivolous and fanciful differences are enough to reveal their hostile passions and provoke their fiercest conflict before the most important event occurs. But the most pervasive and enduring source of factions is the diverse and unequal distribution of wealth. Owners and non-proprietors formed separate interests in society. A distinction is made between creditors and debtors. Land interests, productive interests, commercial interests, money interests, along with smaller interests, it is necessary to grow up in civilized nations and divide them into different classes affected by different feelings and points of view. The regulation of these divergent and interfering interests constitutes the fundamental task of modern law and includes partisanship and partisanship in the necessary and ordinary operations of government.

No one is allowed to be a judge for his own good, because his interest inevitably falsifies his judgment and damages his integrity, not accidental. Likewise, now for a greater reason, a male body is not fit to be a judge and a partisan at the same time; However, many of the most important acts of law, but many judicial decisions, are they really about the rights of an individual, but not the rights of many citizen institutions? And the different classes of legislators, but what are the advocates and parties to the cases they identify? A bill on private debt? It is a question where one party is a creditor and the other is a debtor. Justice must strike the balance between them. However, the parties themselves are judges and should be; and should wait for the most numerous side, or in other words, the strongest side to prevail. Should domestic producers be encouraged and to what extent should foreign producers be restricted? are questions to be decided differently by the landlords and the producing classes, and which do not concern justice and public interest. Allocating taxes to different definitions of property is an act requiring the most rigorous fairness; perhaps there is no legislative act in which more opportunity and temptation is given to a ruling party to break the rules of justice. Each shilling exceeding the lower figure is a shilling deposited in its own pocket.

It would be futile to say that enlightened statesmen could reconcile these conflicting interests and serve all of them in the public interest. Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the top. In many cases, it is also impossible to make such an adjustment without taking into account indirect and distant considerations, which seldom outweigh the immediate benefits that a party can derive by waiving the rights of others or the interests of the whole.

The deduction brought to us,REASONfactions cannot be eliminated, and such relief is only sought by control.EFFECT.

If a faction is made up of a majority less than a majority, then republican rule is achieved, which allows the majority to defeat their bad views by ordinary voting. It can clog the government, corrupt society; however, it will not be able to implement and cover up the violence it has committed in the Constitution. On the other hand, when the majority is in a faction, the popular form of government allows them to make sacrifices for their passion to rule or to be concerned with both the public interest and the rights of other citizens. To secure the public interest and private rights against the dangers of such a faction, and to preserve the spirit and form of the people’s government to which our demands are directed. Let me add that it is the greatest wish that this form of government can be freed from the humiliations with which it has so long struggled and promoted the respect and acceptance of humanity.

In what ways can this object be accessed? Obviously only by one of the two. Depending on the amount and local conditions, either the existence of the same passion or interest should be prevented by the simultaneous majority, or the majority that has the same passion or interest at the same time should be made. harmonizing and executing effective printing plans. We know very well that if impulse and chance overlap, neither moral nor religious motives can be relied upon as an adequate control. They are not regarded as such according to the injustice and violence of individuals and lose their effectiveness in proportion to their total amount, that is, to the extent that their effectiveness becomes necessary.

From this point of view, it can be concluded that I am talking about pure democracy, that is, a society made up of a small number of citizens who come together directly and run the government. There is, of course, no cure for sectarian deceptions. In most cases, a common passion or interest will be felt by the majority of the population; the result of a communication and concert from the very form of government; and nothing to test the weaker side or the temptation to sacrifice an obnoxious individual. Therefore, such democracies have been a scene of chaos and conflict; found to be incompatible with personal security or property rights; and, in general, their lives are so short that they are abused at their death. Theoretical politicians who support this type of government assume that by reducing humanity to full equality in terms of political rights, they will also be equal, fully equal, and assimilated in their existence, views, and passions. .

The republic, that is, a government with representative planning, opens a different perspective and promises the cure we seek. Let us consider the points where it differs from pure democracy and we will understand both the nature of the treatment and the effect it must have from the Union.

The two major differences between democracy and republic are: first the authorization of the government, then the empowerment of a small number of citizens elected by the rest; second, greater numbers of citizens and a wider national scope to expand the country.

The effect of the first distinction is, on the one hand, to improve and broaden public opinion, by bringing together a select group of citizens whose minds can best discern their country’s true interests and patriotism. and the love of justice will be less likely to sacrifice it for temporary or partial concerns. Under such arrangements, the public voice heard by the representative of the people is more likely to have a greater public interest impact than the voices of the people gathered for a purpose themselves. Otherwise, the effect can be reversed. People who are hot-tempered, partially prejudiced, or devious may first suffer through intrigue, corruption, or other means, and then betray the interests of the people. The question is, are small or large republics more conducive to popular election of suitable guardians; and it was clearly decided in favor of the latter, with two obvious considerations:

First of all, it should be noted that no matter how small the republic, representatives must be increased to a certain number in order to be protected against the swindlers of the minority; and no matter how big they are, they should be limited to a certain number to avoid crowd mixing. Therefore, the number of representations in the two states is disproportionate to the representation of the two components, and is proportionally larger in the small republic, so it will happen if the proportion of characters match in the big country no less than in the small republic. republic, the previous republic will present a greater choice and therefore a higher probability of a viable election.

In the next place, since each representative will be elected by more citizens in the big country than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to successfully apply bad techniques. Elections are too frequent; and suffering of the freer will be more likely to focus on men with the most attractive talents and the most famous and prestigious figures.

Admittedly, in this case, as in many other cases, there is a bad connotation that there will be drawbacks on both sides of the lie. By enlarging the electorate too much, you are making the representatives too little familiar with all of their local conditions and less of an interest; For example, when you get too small, you become too attached to these things and too little fit to understand and pursue big and national goals. The federal constitution is a pleasant combination in this respect; Great and collective interests are attributed to the national, local, and specifically State legislatures.

Another difference is that the number of citizens and territory that can be included in a republican form of government is greater than in a democratic government; and it is precisely this that makes combinations of conveniences essentially less intimidating in the first case than in the second case. The smaller the society, the less likely it is to be created by separate parties and interests; the fewer sides and interests differ, the more often the majority is on the same side; and the smaller the number of individuals who make up the majority and the smaller the compass on which they are placed, the easier it is for them to adapt and carry out their repressive plans. Expand your reach and attract more parties and interests; you reduce the likelihood that the entire majority will have a common motive to violate the rights of other citizens; or if there is such a common motive, it will be more difficult for anyone who feels it to discover their own strength and act simultaneously. Among other barriers, it can be observed that where there is a sense of treacherous or nefarious purposes, communication must always be tested by distrust in proportion to the amount of consent.

It is therefore clear that in controlling the influence of factions, the same advantage a republic has over democracy is enjoyed by a large country over a small republic. Will the advantage be in replacing representatives whose views and morals make them superior to local prejudices and unjust conspiracies? It will not be denied that the Union representative will be more likely to have these necessary funds. Does it include more security provided by more parties if any one party outnumbers and puts pressure on the others? Equally, the growing diversity of parties involved in the Union strengthens this security. But does it contain greater obstacles to the concert and the fulfillment of the secret desires of the unjust and interested audiences? Here again the size of the Alliance gave it the most obvious advantage.

The influence of benevolent leaders may ignite the flames in their own State, but they will not be able to spread the general explosion to other States. A religious denomination may become a political faction within a division of the Confederacy; but the diversity of sects scattered all over its face should protect the national assemblies from any danger that may come from this source. Anger at paper money, debt forgiveness, equal division of property, or any other wrong or bad project is less likely to happen to a particular member of the Confederacy; at the same rates, a disease is more likely to infect a particular county or county than the entire State.

Therefore, within the proper scope and structure of the Union, we see it as a republican remedy for the ailments most affected by republican government. And to the degree of joy and pride we feel as republicans, we must have a passion to appreciate the spirit and character of the Federalists.


Video tutorials about a confederate form of government is subservient to the ________.

keywords: #EconCourseCompanion, #EconomicsCourseCompanion!, #IBEconomicsCourseCompanion, #course, #theworldisourclassroom, #econtutorial, #companion, #iMovie, #bradcartwright, #economicstutorial, #EconomicsCourseCompanion, #Econcoursecompanion, #IBCourseCompanion, #economics, #YourIBEconomicsCourseCompanion!

FILLING THE GAP between what the IB EXPECTS you to do and how to ACTUALLY DO IT in the IB ECONOMICS classroom!



Over 400+ Video Lessons!

Over 1000+ Downloadable Documents!

– Study Notes

– Vocabulary Lists

– Key Terms and Concepts

– Review Questions

– IB Exam Review Questions

“This website saved my IB Diploma! They are informative, funny, entertaining!” – IB Student Member

“As a NEW IB Economics teacher, Brad’s workshops u0026 resources saved me!” – IB Teacher Member

“Brad’s IB Teacher Workshops are the best in the market place!” – IB Workshop Attendee 2021


Class of 2022:


Class of 2023:



Teacher Memberships:


Teacher Workshops:


Teacher Resource eBooks:


Teacher Mentoring Program:


Yearly School Membership:



Check the latest:



Check the latest:



School Membership:



Contact Information: [email protected]


Stay safe out there,









keywords: #LearningVideosChannel

What is a Confederal Governments? A confederation is a system of government in which sovereign states delegate power to a central government for specific purposes. Examples: defense and the regulation of trade.

A confederation (also known as a confederacy or league) is a union of sovereign states, united for purposes of common action often in relation to other states. Usually created by a treaty, confederations of states tend to be established for dealing with critical issues, such as defense, foreign relations, internal trade or currency, with the general government being required to provide support for all its members. Confederalism represents a main form of inter-governmentalism, this being defined as any form of interaction between states which takes place on the basis of sovereign independence or government.

The nature of the relationship among the member states constituting a confederation varies considerably. Likewise, the relationship between the member states and the general government, and the distribution of powers among them is highly variable. Some looser confederations are similar to international organisations. Other confederations with stricter rules may resemble federal systems.

Since the member states of a confederation retain their sovereignty, they have an implicit right of secession. Political philosopher Emmerich Vattel observed: ‘Several sovereign and independent states may unite themselves together by a perpetual confederacy without each in particular ceasing to be a perfect state. … The deliberations in common will offer no violence to the sovereignty of each member’.

Under a confederal arrangement, in contrast with a federal one, the central authority is relatively weak. Decisions made by the general government in a unicameral legislature, a council of the member states, require subsequent implementation by the member states to take effect. They are therefore not laws acting directly upon the individual, but instead have more the character of inter-state agreements. Also, decision-making in the general government usually proceeds by consensus (unanimity) and not by majority, which makes for a slow and inefficient government.[citation needed] These problematic features, limiting the effectiveness of the union, mean that political pressure tends to build over time for the transition to a federal system of government, as happened in the US, Swiss and German cases of regional integration.

Many scholars have claimed that the Kingdom of Belgium, a country with a complicated federal structure, has adopted some characteristics of a confederation under the pressure of separatist movements, especially in Flanders. For example, C. E. Lagasse declared that Belgium was “near the political system of a Confederation” regarding the constitutional reform agreements between Belgian Regions (federated states with well-defined geographical borders: Flanders, Wallonia and Greater Brussels) and between Communities (statelike authorities based on the mother tongue, not geography).

In Canada, the word confederation has an additional, unrelated meaning. “Confederation” refers to the process of (or the event of) establishing or joining the Canadian federal state.

In modern terminology, Canada is a federation and not a confederation. However, to contemporaries of the Constitution Act, 1867, confederation did not have the same connotation of a weakly centralized federation. Canadian Confederation generally refers to the Constitution Act, 1867, which formed the Dominion of Canada from three of the colonies of British North America, and to the subsequent incorporation of other colonies and territories. Therefore, on 1 July 1867, Canada became a self-governing dominion of the British Empire with a federal structure under the leadership of Sir John A. Macdonald. The provinces involved were the Province of Canada (comprising Canada West, now Ontario, formerly Upper Canada; and Canada East, now Quebec, formerly Lower Canada), Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. Later participants were Manitoba, British Columbia, Prince Edward Island, Alberta and Saskatchewan (the latter two created as provinces from the Northwest Territories in 1905), and finally Newfoundland (now Newfoundland and Labrador) in 1949. Canada is an unusually decentralized federal state and not a confederate association of sovereign states (the usual meaning of confederation in modern terms).

Due to its unique nature, and the political sensitivities surrounding it, there is no common or legal classification for the European Union (EU). However, it does bear some resemblance to both a confederation (or a “new” type of confederation) and a federation. The term supranational union has also been applied. The EU operates common economic policies with hundreds of common laws, which enable a single economic market, a common customs territory, (mainly) open internal borders, and a common currency among most member-states.

keywords: #of, #Government, #Confederation

SS6CG4 The student will compare and contrast various forms of government.

a. Describe the ways government systems distribute power: unitary, confederation, and federal.

keywords: #APUnitedStatesGovernment, #UnitedStatesOfAmerica(Country), #Government(QuotationSubject), #Confederation(FormOfGovernment), #UnitaryState(FormOfGovernment), #Federalism(PoliticalIdeology), #Power, #Federation(FormOfGovernment)

How do governments distribute power? One way political scientists like to classify governments is by their geographic distribution of power.

In this video, I review the three main ways to do this: unitary governments, confederation governments, and federal governments. Not sure what those are? Take a few minutes and learn!

See more articles in category: fqas

Maybe you are interested

Sale off:

Best post: